Verse 1. Sin, or Sina, (verse 3,) bordering upon Idumea, where the city of Cades-barne was situated. Numbers 13:22. It is now impossible to ascertain the precise situation of all the place mentioned in Scripture, as the land of Chanaan has been subject to so many changes. But this inconvenience attends all ancient geography. If those who attempt to unravel such labyrinths in profane authors, deserve praise, much more do those who do their utmost to explain the difficulties of sacred history. It was once very necessary to have the limits of the tribes marked out with precision, that, at the return from captivity, they might occupy their own. Now we may be satisfied if we can point out some of the places of the greatest importance. The limits of the tribe of Juda are specified with particular care, on account of the dignity and power of that tribe, which was to give kings to all the land, and a Messias to the world, as well as to preserve the true religion. The greatest part of the southern regions of Chanaan fell to their share, from the Dead Sea, by Idumea, to the Nile, and as far north as Jerusalem and the torrent of Cedron. Calmet.
Joshua
Verse 2. Bay, (lingua,) tongue. Chal. “a promontory,” or rather a gulph. Calmet.
Joshua
Verse 3. Scorpion. A mountain infested with those creatures, by which people travelled from Idumea into Chanaan, leaving Sina on the left.
Joshua
Verse 4. Asemona, which lies nearest to the river of Egypt of all the cities of Juda. Numbers 34:4. Calmet. 13:3.
Joshua
Verse 5. Jordan, where it discharges itself into the Dead Sea, or mixes its waters with the latter; which, as we observe, (Calmet. 5:16,) does not take place for three miles. Bible.—the north-western part of this sea belonged to Benjamin.
Joshua
Verse 6. Stone. It is not certain that this was a city.
Joshua
Verse 7. Galgal. Hebrew Gilgal, may designate “the limits.” The valley of Achor lay south of Galgal.—Sun. Hebrew “Hen-Shemesh.” It was not “a city.”—Rogel, “of the fuller.” This fountain was in the king’s gardens, running eastward from Sion into the torrent of Cedron. Joseph. vii. 11. It was used to wash linen. Rogel, signifies “to trample on,” as they formerly washed their linen with their feet. Nausicrae is represented in Homer doing so, in holes or basins, prepared for the purpose. Odys. Σ.
Joshua
Verse 8. Ennom. Hebrew, Ge-ben-Hinnom, or simply Ge-ennom, whence Gehanan has probably been formed. In this vale, children were immolated to Moloc: the beating of drums, to hinder their lamentations from being heard, caused it perhaps to be called Tophet. It was to the east of Jerusalem, ( Calmet.) inclining to the south. Bible.—Northward. The valley extends south to Bethlehem. Joseph. vii. 10. Her David gained a great victory, 2 Kennicott. 5:23. Calmet.—Woods. This explanation is added by S. Jerom. Bible.—The ark remained at this city for some time, 1 Kennicott. 15:6. It was 10 miles north of Jerusalem.
Joshua
Verse 10. Bethsames, “the house of the sun,” was at the same distance, westward. Here the sight of the ark proved so fatal to 50,070 of the inhabitants, 1 Kennicott. 6:19. Calmet.
Joshua
Verse 13. Arbe, who was the father, and the greatest man of the race of Enac. Calmet. 14:15. Bible.
Joshua
Verse 14. Enac. These three giants were at Hebron when the spies came thither. Numbers 13.
Joshua
Verse 15. Letters, as the Septuagint render it. S. Jerom adds this interpretation. Bible.—It means literally “the city of the book.” Senna, may also mean “instruction,” verse 49. Here probably a famous school was kept, before the arrival of the Israelites; or the archive of the nation might be deposited among these giants, as the Chal. Kiriat-arche, “the city of the library, or archives,” insinuates. Bochart. Phaleg. ii. 17.
Joshua
Verse 16. Wife. Parents had full authority to do this. Saul promised his daughter to the person who should overcome Goliah. Something was required by way of dowry for the lady. Grot. 1 Kennicott. 17:25.
Joshua
Verse 17. Brother. It is not clear in the original whether this relates to Cenez or to Othoniel, ( Bible.) as younger is not found in Hebrew but it is in the Syr. Septuagint and Judges 1:13. Many think that Cenez was the brother of Caleb. If Othoniel had been brother of the latter, they say he could not have legally married his niece. Calmet.—But though Moses forbids a nephew to marry his aunt, it does not follow that uncles could not take their nieces to wife, as they would be still the head; ( Worthington.) whereas there would be a sort of indecency for a nephew to command his aunt. The Jews allow these marriages, while the Samaritans condemn them. Leviticus 18:14. In confirmation of the Vulg. we may remark, that Cenez is never ( Calmet.) clearly ( Bible.) represented as the brother of Caleb; and there is no inconvenience in asserting that Othoniel was the brother of the latter, whether we take this word to denote a near relation, or strictly. In the former supposition, Othoniel might marry his cousin, Axa, the daughter of Caleb, while he himself was descended from Cenez, the brother of Jephone. Calmet.—But if we take the word strictly, as the remark of his being younger brother, both here and Judges 1:13 may seem to imply, we must then allow that Othoniel followed the custom of his nation, ( Bible.) in marrying his niece. Menochius.—Septuagint here make him “the younger son of Cenez, who was brother of Caleb;” and in the Book of Judges, they say, “Gothoniel, the son of Cenez, (and) the younger brother of Caleb, first made himself master of it, under him;” as if Othoniel and Caleb had been born of the same mother, but of a different father, unless we suppose that they were only nearly related, and the former much less advanced in years; so that he might will marry the daughter of Caleb and afterwards become a judge and deliverer of Israel. Judges 3:9. See Masius. Bonfrere. Bible.
Joshua
Verse 18. Was moved; as the Syr. Arab. Junius, and so forth represent the matter. Others render the Hebrew in a different sense: “she moved him to ask of her father a field, and she lighted off her ass, and Caleb said unto her,” and so forth which seems very abrupt, as she herself is represented as soliciting for the favour in the next verse, instead of her husband. The Chaldee supposes that she was restrained by natural modesty, from preferring the petition; but when Othoniel refused to do it, or was denied what he requested, she took courage and asked herself. The sense of the Vulgate seems more natural, ( Calmet.) as the husband might easily suppose that she would have greater influence with her father. Bible.—Sighed. The original term is found only in this history, and in that of the death of Sisara. Judges 4:21. Septuagint “she cried out.” Others translate, “she remained fixed,” ( Menochius.) or “she waited sitting on the ass,” till she had obtained her request.
Joshua
Verse 19. Blessing, or “favour, present,” &chapter 1 Kennicott. 25:27. Calmet.—And dry. This is a farther explanation of southern; as the lands in that situation being exposed to the sun-beams, in Palestine, are often destitute of sufficient moisture, which is the cause of the sterility of Mount Hebal, and so forth—Watery ground. Hebrew “springs of water, and he gave her the upper springs and the lower springs.” Aquila leaves springs untranslated. Bible.—Golgot. Septuagint “Golathmaim, and the upper Golath,” and so forth Sym. translates “possession on the high places.” Judges 1. Calmet.—Caleb had probably given his daughter a part of the mountain. He now grants her also some field that lay lower down, and was better supplied with water on all sides ( Bible.) by springs above, and cisterns below.
Joshua
Verse 25. New Asor, to distinguish it from the capital of Jabin, in the north. This was dependent on Ascalon. Euseb.—Hebrew “and Hazor, Hadatta, and (or) Kerioth (“the towns”) of Hezron, which is Hazor.” The Septuagint only specify the same town of Asor by different names. There was one towards Arabia. Numbers 11:34.
Joshua
Verse 28. Bersabee, noted for the residence of Abraham, and so forth It is attributed to Simeon, (Calmet. 19:2,) with some other of these towns, as the two tribes lived intermixed, and some changes might be made in the first regulation, to bring things to a greater equality, and as circumstances might require.
Joshua
Verse 31. Siceleg. The Philistines kept possession of it till king Achis gave it to David; and it continued afterwards the property of the kings of Juda.
Joshua
Verse 32. Villages. Twenty-nine of the former cities were of greater note; the six, or taking in the three belonging to Caleb, the nine others which are mentioned, ( Calmet.) were only villages. Menochius.—Others think that these nine towns are not numbered here, because they were allotted to the tribe of Simeon. Calmet. 19:2, and so forth
Joshua
Verse 33. Plains. Hebrew Schephela, near Eleutheropolis. Chap. 10:40.—Estaol was afterwards given to Dan. Samson was buried near it and Sarea. Judges 16.
Joshua
Verse 36. Fourteen. One of those mentioned above, may have been a village. Menochius.—Others think that Enaim may be the name of a fountain, near which perhaps Juda met Thamar. Genesis 38:14.
Joshua
Verse 44. Ceila, which David took from the Philistines, and were he was nearly betrayed into the hands of Saul, 1 Kennicott. 28. Habacuc was buried here, on the road between Eleutheropolis and Hebron.
Joshua
Verse 55. Carmel. Not where Elias dwelt, but a city and mountain 10 miles east of Eleutheropolis. Nabal rendered it famous by his imprudence, (1 Kennicott. 25) and Saul by a triumphal arch, 1 Kennicott. 15:12.
Joshua
Verse 58. Bessur. About 20 miles from Jerusalem, fortified by Simon, 1 Maccabees 14:33. It is there said to be only five stadia distant from that city. But the Alexandrian copy reads five schœnus, or cords, each of which consisted of at least 30 stadia. Cellarius.
Joshua
Verse 59. Eltecon: given afterwards to the tribe of Dan, (Calmet. 19:44,) and then to the Levites. Calmet. 21:13. The Alex. Septuagint here add many cities, which are omitted in Hebrew Calmet.—“Theco and Ephrata, (this is Bethlehem) and Phagor, and Artam, and Koulon, and Tatami, and Sores, and Karem, and Gallim, and Baither, and Manocho, eleven cities and their villages.” Bible. See Saint Jerome in Mic. verse 1. Calmet. Deuteronomy 27:4.—Dr. Wall says, “these cities were doubtless in the Hebrew copy of the Sept.” and “they are of such a nature, that it is scarcely possible to think them an interpolation.” The former critic thinks “the omission in the Hebrew was occasioned by the word villages occurring immediately before, and at the end of the words thus omitted; and indeed the same word occurring in different places, has been the cause of many and great omission in the Hebrew MSS. He thinks it less likely that the Jews should have designedly omitted Bethlehem here, because that place is mentioned as belonging to Juda, in several other parts of Scripture.” But is Ephrata ever joined with it, except in this passage, and in the text of Micheas? “And, therefore, though this remarkable omission was probably owing, at first, to some transcriber’s mistake, its not being reinserted might be owing to the reason specified by S. Jerom, out of malice to Christianity.” Kennicott, 2 Diss. 56.—Reland is astonished to find a place which was to be rendered so famous by the birth of the Messias, not enumerated in this place among the cities of Juda. But he observes that it is found in the Alexandrian version, p. 643. Palest.—S. Jerom will not decide absolutely whether the Jews have erased these cities, or the Septuagint have inserted them. As he undertook to translate the Hebrew as he found it, he has not admitted these cities into his translation, though there seems to be abundant reason for supposing that they are genuine. Bible.
Joshua
Verse 62. Salt. Bonfrere supposes it is Segor, which was preserved for Lot’s sake.—Engaddi, which was famous for its balm and palm-trees, in the desert of Jericho. Solin. xxxv.—We may here remark that in the preceding catalogues, many towns are repeated like Zanoe, (verse 34 and 56,) and others are left out. Some are also afterwards attributed to other tribes. Hence some have inferred that alterations have been made in the original copies. But we may rather believe that the reason of these variations is, because the cities were parceled out among the 10 families of Juda, (1 Chronicles 2:3,) as was the case in the distribution of land to Manasses; (Calmet. 17:2,) and hence the same cities were sometimes given to two different families. They are also attributed to different tribes, because many families of the respective tribes dwelt in them. The priests, for example, lived along with their brethren of other tribes. Calmet.
Joshua
Verse 63. Jerusalem. The Benjamites claimed the northern part of this city; ( Bible.) and they did not drive out the Jebusites, but lived with them, Judges 1:21. The tribe of Juda had burnt a part of the city. Judges 1:8. But it seems the Jebusites kept their hold, ( Calmet.) at least in the citadel, ( Bible.) and frequently in the lower town, till they were entirely banished by David, 2 Kennicott. 5:7. See Judges 19:11. In latter times, the Jews considered this place as the common city of all the nation, to which none of the tribes had an exclusive right; and hence, in the last siege, there was no head, and all the Jews were admitted without examination. Josephus. Bel. iv. 5, and so forth Calmet.—Day, and even till the reign of David. The author of this observation must have lived before that period. Josue might have made this and may other similar remarks, when he finished this work, towards the end of his life. Bible.